in reply to Re: Re: ISO technical document outlining system requirements for Perl
in thread ISO technical document outlining system requirements for Perl

From a black-box view, it's interpreting Perl, regardless of how many internal steps it takes to get there.
That's silly. That would mean that 
    #!/bin/bash
    gcc -o blabla program.c
    ./blabla
    rm blabla

[download]
is a C interpreter.

I've never heard of a definition of an interpreter as "a compiler that directly executes the code it generates".

Abigail

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: ISO technical document outlining system requirements for Perl
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Mar 04, 2004 at 00:51 UTC
    Definition of interpreter: "An interpreter translates high-level instructions into an intermediate form, which it then executes. ..."

    By that definition, your bash script most definitly is an interpreter. And, so is Perl.

    Another definition I saw "a program that translates and executes source language statements one line at a time". By that definition, neither your script nor Perl is an interpreter. (That definition was also found here and here.)

    *shrugs* The devil's in the details, I guess. I take a black-box approach, which is supported by webopedia. You are taking a white-box approach, supported by hyperdictionary, computerdictionary, and thefreedictionary. If we were to vote on it, you'd Kerry my Edwards, I guess. *grins*

    ------
    We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

    Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom