in reply to Consideration overhaul?

I really like suggestion 2, especially coupled with the idea that certain types of Consideration require a couple of hours before they become available. I think Edit should be available right away, but Delete should require a delay. Not saying anything new here, just voicing my opinion on the matter.

Out of curiosity, though, is there a reason this overhaul is being considered? Are there a lot of Considerations going across the board that shouldn't be? I guess I'm just wondering if there's any justification for adding even more complexity to the Monastery.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Consideration overhaul?
by castaway (Parson) on Mar 09, 2004 at 06:25 UTC
    Since what are good and bad reasons to consider, are largely a matter of opinion, I purposely avoided mentioning what prompted this conversation. (And Im not going to add it).

    In general though, there have been some which have lead to reapings of nodes as 'not perl', when it turned out the author just didnt explain enough, which they went on to do, despite the root node being reaped. C.