in reply to Re^4: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery?
in thread Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery?
(re downvoting) There's no interaction.
The voting itself is interaction.
It's an expression that the post was so bad, it doesn't merit a reply.
Perhaps that is how you view downvotes. I do not. Usually when I downvote, I reply and tell what is wrong with the post (not saying anything about how I voted). UNLESS someone has already done so OR the post is just a stupid flame.
And you think that a reply is too subtle?
No, a reply is not subtle at all.
They really need a vote?
There is no question of *need* regarding XP or votes.
Just so you know, I didn't vote on your posts. But you do know what I think about them, don't you?
I can guess. You choose how you vote. I'm not saying any voting strategy is bad, as long as you vote for nodes, not people. You chose not to vote, I chose to vote. We both have our reasons for doing (or not doing) so. One of the reasons I vote for most replies is that I have plenty of votes to cast.
Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re*: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery?
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Mar 11, 2004 at 17:51 UTC | |
by Juerd (Abbot) on Mar 11, 2004 at 18:08 UTC |