in reply to (tye)Re: New code wrap options
in thread New code wrap options

If someone wants a class designation for this, then come up with a nice, short, clear name for the class.

class="fragment"

However getting short and clear at the same times seems to me to be setting the bar too high. Maybe having one without the other is preferable?


---
demerphq

    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
    -- Gandhi

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: New code wrap options (in-line code CSS class)
by tye (Sage) on Mar 12, 2004 at 19:06 UTC

    Well, I'd just do "inlinecode".

    - tye        

[reply]

      Yep, that was my original though as well, but it seemed too long considering your requirements. I actually thought of suggesting 'icode' but thought that wasnt sufficiently clear. 'inline' or 'inlinecode' seems good to me, as does 'fragment' still.


      ---
      demerphq

        First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
        -- Gandhi
[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion