in reply to Perl Dev Kit - opinions sought

I have used the Active State PDK in the past. I rather liked it as a developement tool. The integration of the debugger was a nice bit; I like having multiple windows open in the code and the debugger, so the ActiveState methodology fit right in. At the time I thought that it was a worth while investment.

The down side I found was that modules hit CPAN several days (or in hard cases weeks) before they were available from the PPM repository. But that's a bad thing only if you have to be at the (b)leading edge; for the more cautions of us, it should not cause problems.

Lately I have been doing most of my coding on Linux/Solaris and "porting" over to Windows during the last week or so before a code release. It does require a little pre-planning to keep the module libraries in sync. You can't just add a new version of something without verifying that the module is available in both environments. Like a lot of other things, it's just a matter of a little prior planning.

If I were developing in a pure Windows environment again, I'd upgrade my PDK. But I'd also look at pEdit and at Eclipse as well. (My current IDE is called 'vim'.)

----
I Go Back to Sleep, Now.

OGB

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Perl Dev Kit - opinions sought
by jplindstrom (Monsignor) on Mar 14, 2004 at 20:14 UTC
    The down side I found was that modules hit CPAN several days (or in hard cases weeks) before they were available from the PPM repository.

    Huh? What does the PPM repository have to do with the Perl Dev Kit?

    /J