Re: File::Find considered hard?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: File::Find considered hard? by etcshadow (Priest) on Mar 14, 2004 at 21:29 UTC
Good to know... now I can be rox0rzing all over your systems by creating a file named /home/etcshadow/foo\n/etc/shadow. w00t! </script-kiddie> `------------ :Wq Not an editor command: Wq` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re: File::Find considered hard? by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Mar 14, 2004 at 21:39 UTC
now I can be rox0rzing all over your systems by creating a file No, you won't be able to. Abigail	[reply]
Re: Re: File::Find considered hard? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 15, 2004 at 04:40 UTC
A fine perpetuation of ignorance. Perhaps if you're going to bother to post, you could actually explain why that doesn't cause any problems. It's rather sad to see perlmonks dwindle down to nothing more than "do this" / "no that's bad" / "no it's not" / "yes it is." I'll be on my way now.	[reply]
Re^3: File::Find considered hard? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 15, 2004 at 06:03 UTC
Re: Re^3: File::Find considered hard? by etcshadow (Priest) on Mar 15, 2004 at 06:18 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re: File::Find considered hard? by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Mar 15, 2004 at 08:29 UTC
Re: Re: File::Find considered hard? by tilly (Archbishop) on Mar 15, 2004 at 10:47 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^2: File::Find considered hard? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 15, 2004 at 06:06 UTC
works on any platform I would care about. Hrm. Do other version of Windows other than XP spit out the info you'd expect from 'find .'? Such a command on my WinXP box is invalid.	[reply]
Re: File::Find considered hard? by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Mar 15, 2004 at 08:31 UTC
Do other version of Windows other than XP spit out the info you'd expect from 'find .'? Yes, assuming you've installed an appropriate Unix toolset. I don't care at all about Windows. Abigail	[reply]