Re: Re: Autogenerate descending arrays

By the way, using reverse is faster because this case is optimized as the action mentioned in the subject is very common :)

Comment on Re: Re: Autogenerate descending arrays Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Autogenerate descending arrays by ysth (Canon) on Mar 14, 2004 at 23:25 UTC
How is it optimized?	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Autogenerate descending arrays by kappa (Chaplain) on Mar 15, 2004 at 14:30 UTC
I stand corrected. Looks like `foreach (reverse 1 .. 1000000)` still generates a huge temporary list.	[reply] [d/l]