in reply to Golfing and Sprinting
On the other hand, Knuth, among others, claim that "premature optimization is the root of all evil", for a few reasons:Yes, good points, although I'd change the 'often' of the second and third points to 'sometimes' - assuming we talk about Perl here, and not C or assembler. Note however that these points all deal with full programs, probably running in production, and created while being paid.
- You can easily waste more time and money optimizing code than you will save in running it
- Optimized code often has a funky, fragile structure that is hard to modify or generalize down the line.
- Optimized code is often hard to read, and/or things are done in inexplicible ways.
Because of these problems, we should not encourage novices by indulging in such 'evil' speed optimization challenges.That's a conclusion I don't want to draw. Typically the challenges presented here and in other forums are about a small piece of code, that's isolated from their context. I think that playing around with a small piece of code, trying out alternatives, consider what they do, without the burden of context is an excellent way to understand a language better.
Abigail
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Golfing and Sprinting
by lachoy (Parson) on Mar 16, 2004 at 03:35 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Golfing and Sprinting
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 16, 2004 at 01:59 UTC |