in reply to Is mod_perl for Windoze not ready for prime time?

I don't recall ever seeing mod_perl-1.99. I've seen mod_perl-1.99_01 through mod_perl-1.99_13. Which one do you have?

Did you google for the error message? Doesn't seem like a mod_perl issue and googling seems to confirm it

MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

  • Comment on Re: Is mod_perl for Windoze not ready for prime time?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Is mod_perl for Windoze not ready for prime time?
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 17, 2004 at 03:05 UTC
    I've googled, I've post bug reports. In fact a lot of folks have posted bugs reports. It's the lastest greatest. I even compiled with a later version of perl. However, I agree. It's Apache, but you can't separate the two.
[reply]
      It's Apache, but you can't separate the two.
      Why not? All the bug reports I saw made no mention whatsoever of mod_perl so the problem is an Apache problem, not related at all to mod_perl (meaning seek help from the Apache folks, not perl folks).

      MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
      I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
      ** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom