in reply to Re: Re: Resources for Functional Programming?
in thread Resources for Functional Programming?

re: #1
You are absolutely correct. Good eyes there. Of course if we are gonna be picky, then head should be:

sub head (@) { $_[0] }
to also avoid the "side-effect" effect of shift.

re: #2
I see what you are saying here, but approx. 300 lines of code IMO, is not really appropraite to post in a node. As for posting the code elsewhere (website/CPAN/whatever), it was really just an exercise for fun, to see how far i could push Perl into the realm of functional programming, I have no delusions that it is good for anything outside of that.

-stvn

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: (3) Resources for Functional Programming?
by tilly (Archbishop) on Mar 20, 2004 at 03:06 UTC
    The desire to have more data in a node than people want to see scrolling over it is what READMORE is for.