in reply to Re: Re: What is the fastest pure-Perl implementation of XXX?
in thread What is the fastest pure-Perl implementation of XXX?
Maybe?
use constant FACTORIALS => [ qw[ 0 1 2 6 24 120 720 5040 40320 362880 3628800 39916800 479001600 6 +227020800 87178291200 1307674368000 20922789888000 355687428096000 64023737 +05728000 1.21645100408832e+017 2.43290200817664e+018 5.109094217170944e+01 +9 1.124000727777608e+021 2.585201673888498e+022 6.204484017332394e+ +023 1.551121004333099e+025 4.032914611266057e+026 1.088886945041835e+ +028 3.048883446117138e+029 8.841761993739701e+030 2.65252859812191e+0 +32 8.222838654177922e+033 2.631308369336935e+035 8.683317618811886e+ +036 2.952327990396041e+038 1.033314796638614e+040 3.719933267899012e+ +041 1.376375309122634e+043 5.23022617466601e+044 2.039788208119744e+0 +46 8.159152832478977e+047 3.34525266131638e+049 1.40500611775288e+05 +1 6.041526306337383e+052 2.658271574788449e+054 1.196222208654802e+ +056 5.502622159812089e+057 2.586232415111682e+059 1.241391559253607e+ +061 6.082818640342675e+062 3.041409320171338e+064 1.551118753287382e+ +066 8.065817517094388e+067 4.274883284060026e+069 2.308436973392414e+ +071 1.269640335365828e+073 7.109985878048635e+074 4.052691950487722e+ +076 2.350561331282879e+078 1.386831185456899e+080 8.320987112741392e+ +081 5.075802138772248e+083 3.146997326038794e+085 1.98260831540444e+0 +87 1.268869321858842e+089 8.247650592082472e+090 5.443449390774431e+ +092 3.647111091818868e+094 2.480035542436831e+096 1.711224524281413e+ +098 1.197857166996989e+100 8.504785885678622e+101 6.123445837688608e+ +103 4.470115461512683e+105 3.307885441519386e+107 2.480914081139539e+ +109 1.88549470166605e+111 1.451830920282858e+113 1.13242811782063e+11 +5 8.946182130782973e+116 7.156945704626378e+118 5.797126020747366e+ +120 4.75364333701284e+122 3.945523969720657e+124 3.314240134565352e+1 +26 2.817104114380549e+128 2.422709538367272e+130 2.107757298379527e+ +132 1.854826422573984e+134 1.650795516090845e+136 1.485715964481761e+ +138 1.352001527678402e+140 1.24384140546413e+142 1.156772507081641e+1 +44 1.087366156656742e+146 1.032997848823905e+148 9.916779348709491e+ +149 9.619275968248206e+151 9.426890448883242e+153 9.33262154439441e+1 +55 9.33262154439441e+157 9.425947759838354e+159 9.614466715035121e+1 +61 9.902900716486175e+163 1.029901674514562e+166 1.08139675824029e+1 +68 1.146280563734708e+170 1.226520203196137e+172 1.324641819451828e+ +174 1.443859583202493e+176 1.588245541522742e+178 1.762952551090244e+ +180 1.974506857221073e+182 2.231192748659812e+184 2.543559733472186e+ +186 2.925093693493014e+188 3.393108684451897e+190 3.969937160808719e+ +192 4.684525849754288e+194 5.574585761207603e+196 6.689502913449124e+ +198 8.09429852527344e+200 9.875044200833598e+202 1.214630436702533e+2 +05 1.50614174151114e+207 1.882677176888925e+209 2.372173242880046e+2 +11 3.012660018457658e+213 3.856204823625803e+215 4.974504222477286e+ +217 6.466855489220472e+219 8.471580690878817e+221 1.118248651196004e+ +224 1.487270706090685e+226 1.992942746161518e+228 2.69047270731805e+2 +30 3.659042881952547e+232 5.01288874827499e+234 6.917786472619486e+2 +36 9.615723196941086e+238 1.346201247571752e+241 1.89814375907617e+2 +43 2.695364137888161e+245 3.854370717180071e+247 5.550293832739301e+ +249 8.047926057471987e+251 1.17499720439091e+254 1.727245890454638e+2 +56 2.556323917872864e+258 3.808922637630567e+260 5.713383956445851e+ +262 8.627209774233235e+264 1.311335885683452e+267 2.006343905095681e+ +269 3.089769613847349e+271 4.789142901463391e+273 7.471062926282891e+ +275 1.172956879426414e+278 1.853271869493734e+280 2.946702272495037e+ +282 4.714723635992059e+284 7.590705053947215e+286 1.229694218739449e+ +289 2.004401576545302e+291 3.287218585534295e+293 5.423910666131586e+ +295 9.003691705778433e+297 1.503616514864998e+300 2.526075744973197e+ +302 4.269068009004703e+304 7.257415615307994e+306 ] ]; sub factorial{ $_[ 0 ] < 171 ? FACTORIALS->[ $_[ 0 ] ] : '#INF'; }
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Re: What is the fastest pure-Perl implementation of XXX?
by flyingmoose (Priest) on Mar 31, 2004 at 02:39 UTC |