That would be a good optimization if the list of "banned" words were fixed and immutable. Then program logic could deal with all one-letter and two-letter words, as well as single-digit numbers. But I stuck with the philosophy of explicitally naming the "banned" words so that the list could be maintained without diving into the program's logic. I was also thinking of the possibility that there could be a banned-word file, rather than using the __DATA__ filehandle.
Good point though; if I hadn't been designing with maintainability and flexibility in the word list in mind, I would completely agree that there is a more efficient way to block all single-letter and double-letter words.
| [reply] |