Re: Re*: Encouraging comments for downvotes

You are overstating the case. Those who ++ could well have something to add or correct, but they don't. Those who -- might have nothing but their (perhaps incorrect) perception of the node, or they might be voting randomly, or they might be voting for reasons that have nothing to do with the node.

Any of these jackasses care to comment?

Comment on Re: Re*: Encouraging comments for downvotes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re*: Encouraging comments for downvotes by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Apr 05, 2004 at 20:39 UTC
You are overstating the case. I am giving the general case. There's no productive purpose in discussing the pathological cases. Those who -- might have nothing but their (perhaps incorrect) perception of the node This makes no sense. Of course they have nothing but their perception of it. How could they have more than they perceive? And why would that preclude them from sharing their perception? The PerlMonk `tr///` Advocate	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re*: Encouraging comments for downvotes
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Apr 05, 2004 at 20:39 UTC

You are overstating the case.

Those who -- might have nothing but their (perhaps incorrect) perception of the node

The PerlMonk tr/// Advocate

[reply]