in reply to RE: Re: finding min and max of array recursivly
in thread finding min and max of array recursivly

Hmm, upon further inspection your algorithm is the following:
sub divide { my $mid = @_/2; $ITER++; return if @_ == 1; divide(@_[0 .. $mid - 1]); divide(@_[$mid .. $#_]); } for (10 .. 30) { $ITER = 0; divide(1 .. $_); printf "%2d %2d\n", $_, $ITER; }
The order of this is N, really. Specifically, it's 2*N-1. T(N) is the time it takes to call divide() for a list of N values:
T(1) = 1 T(2) = 1 + 2*T(1) T(4) = 1 + 2*T(2) ... T(N) = 1 + 2*T(N/2)
We can then expand backwards from the generality:
T(N) = 1 + 2*T(N/2) = 1 + 2*(1 + 2*T(N/4)) = 1 + 2 + 4*T(N/4) --> = 3 + 4*T(N/4) = 3 + 4*(1 + 2*T(N/8)) = 3 + 4 + 8*T(N/8) --> = 7 + 8*T(N/8) = 7 + 8*(1 + 2*T(N/16)) = 7 + 8 + 16*T(N/16) --> = 15 + 16*T(N/16)
The general equation here is T(N) = 2^k - 1 + 2^k * T(N / 2^k). We will make the following substitution: k = log(N) (base 2). We now have:
T(N) = 2^k - 1 + 2^k * T(N / 2^k) = 2^(log N) - 1 + 2^(log N) * T(N / 2^log(N)) = N - 1 + N * T(N/N) = N - 1 + N * 1 = 2*N - 1


$_="goto+F.print+chop;\n=yhpaj";F1:eval

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: Re: finding min and max of array recursivly
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 28, 2000 at 20:08 UTC
    Unless i am mistaken somewhere (which is always possible),
    T(n) = 2*T(N/2) + 2  : not + 1.. there are 2 comparisons.
    
    the equation should simplify as follows:
    let n = 2^k;
    
    T(n) = 2^(k-1)+2^(k-1) + ... + 8 + 4 + 2
         = 2^(k-1)+21+2+4+ ... + 2^(k-2)
         = 2^(k-1)+2(2^(k-1) - 1/2-1)
         = 2^(k-1) + 2^k - 2
         = 2^(k-1)/2 + 2^k - 2
         = 3*2^k/2 - 2
         =  3n/2  -  2
    
    not that it REALLY matters inthe grander scheme of things ...
    but i think that is right ... 
    
      D'oh. Yeah. You're right. Well, we're both right. The runtime is between 2N-1 and 1.5N-2, depending on the ACTUAL number of calculations that end up needing to be done.

      $_="goto+F.print+chop;\n=yhpaj";F1:eval