in reply to Re^6: many to many join on text files
in thread many to many join on text files

2 files, with a million rows each, and dozens of fields each. Suggests that we are likely to be throwing around a few million objects, many of which are going to take up a few hundred bytes.

Even with modern-day computers, this is starting to push what I feel comfortable with assuming is available.

As for not having to lose data you intend to keep, I agree that it is possible to do so. I was just pointing out that your code wouldn't in the circumstance described by the original question.

  • Comment on Re: Re^6: many to many join on text files

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re^6: many to many join on text files
by hv (Prior) on Apr 15, 2004 at 02:30 UTC

    I'm sorry if I was unclear: I was not at any point suggesting putting the whole records (or whole objects derived from those records) in the hash.

    Hugo