replacement for ePerl

mikeps has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Does anyone have a recommendation for a replacement of ePerl? The main reason I ask is because I am having problems with the old version of perl that we are using, because it is the latest that allows ePerl to run (5.005_03). Unless someone knows a way to get ePerl running under the current version of Perl, I need to find a replacement.
Mike

Comment on replacement for ePerl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: replacement for ePerl by perrin (Chancellor) on Apr 15, 2004 at 21:03 UTC
I discussed several in this article.	[reply]
Re: replacement for ePerl by hardburn (Abbot) on Apr 15, 2004 at 20:37 UTC
(I'm assuming you're talking about OSSP Embedded Perl). HTML::Mason does something like that. I'm personally not a fan of embedding code in documents. It goes exactly the wrong direction we should be going: further seperating data and code. Now if only we could get the PHP people to listen . . . ---- `: () { :\|:& };:` Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated	[reply] [d/l]
Re: replacement for ePerl by CountZero (Bishop) on Apr 15, 2004 at 20:47 UTC
Template Toolkit comes to mind or embPerl, esp. if you want to embed Perl into web-pages. CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law	[reply]