in reply to RE: RE: JARTUP (Just Another Reason to Use Perl)
in thread JARTUP (Just Another Reason to Use Perl)

Petruchio,
So please feel free to e-mail it (or even a link) to me.
And yes, I agree to all who say, that something people like so much that they point out their good experiences with it, seems to be good and efficient.
But does that imply that all other solutions are worse?
I don't trust statistics except those I've made up :-))
  • Comment on RE: RE: RE: JARTUP (Just Another Reason to Use Perl)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: RE: JARTUP (Just Another Reason to Use Perl)
by Petruchio (Vicar) on Sep 29, 2000 at 22:15 UTC
    little: "So please feel free to e-mail it (or even a link) to me."

    Actually, it was just a joke... and since the explanation is sort of interesting, I'll go into it.

    Take the equation of this general form, rendered here in Perl:

    ($x**$n + $y**$n) == $z**$n;

    The Pythagorean Theorem, which you doubtless remember, involves a special case:

    ($x**2 + $y**2) == $z**2;

    In 1637, Pierre de Fermat claimed that the general equation was false for any case where ($n > 2); this became known as Fermat's Last Theorem. The theorem was proven only recently, in enormously complex fashion, after about 350 years of anguished mathmeticians losing sleep over it.

    Which brings us to the joke. Fermat, in describing his theorem, noted, "I have discovered a truly marvellous proof, which this margin is too narrow to contain." Which is fairly ridiculous; he pretty certainly discovered no such thing. And neither have I.