in reply to Re: Is Java really better than Perl???
in thread Is Java really better than Perl???

Hi Abigail,

Thanks for the responses. Actually I was only lately told about the decision. A Java guy who doesn't really know Perl (I have seen his code) came up with this idea, and because he is somewhat closer to the manager and at a level higher than me, the issue becomes nasty.

1. Perl programmers were not consulted when this decision was made (by the Java programmer).
2. General accusations were easier to write and sound like they have done thorough research but have really not.
3. It's all to do with company politics.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Is Java really better than Perl???

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Is Java really better than Perl???
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Apr 20, 2004 at 10:40 UTC
    Well, perhaps the only recourse you have is write a clear document why it's not a good idea to drop Perl. Start with organizing - find out who else thinks it's a bad idea to drop Perl - a counter document carries more weight if it's signed by a multitude of people. Make sure the document focusses on why it's bad for the company to drop Perl. Make sure you can back up your argument with facts - just saying that it takes the same amount of resources (== money!) to develop an equivalent program in Perl than a program in Java doesn't say much. If you have figures (which means, you got to do some research) to back up your claims, your arguments will be much stronger. Remember that your document has to be better than the one of the Java guy - he has already won a major battle.

    Abigail