in reply to What is Perl *NOT* good at?
I agree on realtime, as long as it's hard realtime like process control, where you need to know average and maximum times for each program segment. Perl is OK for soft realtime i.e use interaction.
Agree on signals and closed source.
One category I'd add: PalmOS applications. I haven't yet been able to find a Perl that would run on my Tungsten.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: What is Perl *NOT* good at?
by jfroebe (Parson) on Apr 20, 2004 at 20:50 UTC | |
by pope (Friar) on Apr 21, 2004 at 08:13 UTC | |
Re: Re: What is Perl *NOT* good at?
by DrHyde (Prior) on Apr 21, 2004 at 08:38 UTC |