in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Parsing Chess Algebra Notation
in thread Parsing Chess Algebra Notation

You said

Remember, Qa2b3 means that there are three queens, potentially at a2, a4, and b4

Now in your reply you are showing a queen at a2, a3, and c2, and in this case there's no argument that Qa2b3 is unambiguous and necessary.

Please understand, I wasn't disputing the occasional need to use both rank and file, just querying how you could deduce the existence of three queens from Qa2b3

So forgive me if I misunderstood you, but perhaps you can see how my confusion arose.

 

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Parsing Chess Algebra Notation
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on May 04, 2004 at 18:10 UTC
    My bad. In my first example, Qa4b3 would have been the move that required the full notation. :-)

    ------
    We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

    Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose

    I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested