in reply to Re: Re: Re: Trojan Perl Distributions
in thread Trojan Perl Distributions

Very little actually gets registered....

Yes, I am going through all this right now. I am trying to register one of my modules (Tree::Simple), the discussion seems slow and not many people seem interested in talking about it. I have recieved some comments that the name is not so good (which I agree with, but plain old "Tree" is already taken), but that is about all.

Why then should one volunteer's work be slaughtered at some future date because another volunteer never got around to sanctifying it?

I am not sure what you mean here? My problem is with the registered modules which seem to be either abandoned or just never got updated past 0.01. The best example of this I can find right now is Date::Time. It has not been updated from version 0.01, which was uploaded on March 2, 2000. The description itself says this:

This is just some suggestions, as nothing is implemented yet. I'm open to critisism. Anyway I don't know if the original name will fit this module with all my plans....
A code example then follows, but when I look at the source about all it does is declare two packages; Date::Time::UnixTime - which is totally empty, and Date::Time - which only had a 'new' method which does nothing but bless an empty hash. See for yourself here.

It actually seems as if this author has moved on completely, leaving approx. 3 registered and partially finished modules.

Now clearly these are exceptions, but they are clearly serving no use but to pollute the CPAN. It is these modules I think should be reaped (assuming the author either cannot be contacted or has agreed and declared then abandoned).

-stvn
  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Trojan Perl Distributions