in reply to Re: Re: Re: Preferred output for development tool
in thread Preferred output for development tool

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.
  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Preferred output for development tool

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Preferred output for development tool
by Anonymous Monk on May 06, 2004 at 21:51 UTC
    And that's just it. You don't even use POD, yet you think you are better ... that is sad.
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Preferred output for development tool
by Anonymous Monk on May 07, 2004 at 15:24 UTC
    I take pride in my documentation. It's FAR better than anything in perldoc.com
    umm...

    From one of your recent posts

    if I documented it properly ... I'd know what needs to be cleared and wouldn't need a global clear function, but I don't know if creating the necessary documentation would have been practical without anticipating the final form of the script...
    Let's please be clear. The very reason you wrote your VarStructor hack was due to another badly written 3400 line program of yours ("LinkStructor") that:
    1. You don't have time to rewrite to a better standard
    2. You don't have time to properly document
    Interestingly, you do have time to write endless defenses of your "unconventional" and lamentable coding style in this forum.

    The most concerning thing in all this is that the LinkStructor program in question, you are intending to market for your own commercial gain. This, despite acknowledged security holes and bugs.

    Please please listen to Monks who know better than you. Reading your response to posts is like walking continuously into a brick wall.

    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.