in reply to HTTP_REFERER "control"

Could you possibly be any more blatant? At face value your own words would indicate you are attempting to commit fraud. I'm sorry... if you aren't knowledgeable enough to do it on your own I am not going to help you commit fraud.

I guess you like downvotes freak, eh?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: HTTP_REFERER "control"
by b10m (Vicar) on May 09, 2004 at 15:38 UTC

    Although I don't trust freak's intentions, commiting "fraud" can be rather fun too.

    http://www.goto.com/ used to have links that would cost the webpage owner money for each "click". It even had the amount of dollars listed. Now how fun is it to "click" on those links that would bring you to spammer related software? *serpent grin*. LWP is/was perfect for that. Fraudulent, but very nice IMHO.

    --
    b10m

    All code is usually tested, but rarely trusted.
[reply]

          commiting "fraud" can be rather fun too.

      There is fraud and then there is "screwing with somebody". While the former gets my "Irish up" the latter can be a fine way to spend some quality time. As long as it does not take on criminal dimensions.

[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom