Re: A Perl-app for twingling
by perrin (Chancellor) on May 18, 2004 at 19:51 UTC
|
You might get more help if you explain what you are talking about. The encyclopedia entry is almost information-free, and you seem to be talking about searching e-mail, but I can't see why that would require development when there are already hundreds of apps written for it (not to mention IMAP and any old mail client). | [reply] |
|
|
Well, I have written up as much as I could. It is hard to describe, but anyone who has tried out any of Zoe, Six Degrees, or Emila will know instantly what I talking about. They are all free, so those who are interested can download and try them out. I have provided links above. Nonetheless, I will try to describe it here.
Most apps that search email search for matches against user-provided text strings, or some email headers or some combo thereof. The search is initiated by the user. There is nothing serendipitous.
The above apps are different. Let me try to describe it. You click on a date in a calendar, and all the emails for that date show up. You click on an email, and the text of that email shows up with all the html links, all the email lists, attachments, and people mentioned in that email neatly categorized on the side. Click on any one of them and related info shows up. It is like wandering through a maze... every turn brings up a new view.
Here is one analogy... Netflix vs. Blockbuster. Without starting a religous war here, this is why I like BB over Netflix. With Netflix I have to know what I am looking for. I can search on genres and keywords and the app responds with films that match that. With BB I don't have to know anything. I simply wander the aisles and come across new films. The only controlling factor is the BB employee who placed them in the particular aisles. Its like comparing an online catalog with a library. They serve different functions. One can simply wander in a library and be delighted by different things that turn up with every turn one takes.
| [reply] |
|
|
Well, that sounds pretty straightforward actually. You need to index your mail based on various criteria, and then create a way to view them that links to other things related through those criteria. The obvious approach would be to use a database, build an indexer program that you can feed your mail to, and build a web application for displaying and cross-linking. The first step would be to decide which things you will cross-link on and work on creating a database schema and figuring out how to extract them from an e-mail.
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: A Perl-app for twingling
by mojotoad (Monsignor) on May 18, 2004 at 20:32 UTC
|
Jamie Zawinski once described an Intertwingle project aimed at managing personal email repositories.
Some of this was discussed on perl monks: Managing a Personal Email Archive
I am personally interested in any results you come up with, so keep us informed!
Cheers,
Matt
| [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
I am surprised though at the seeming lack of activity of interest in this area
I'm highly interested from a professional standpoint, it's a fascinating problem with lots of cool graph-theory type implications and room for all sorts of whiz-bang algorithmic voodoo. It's great. But as far as email goes, I'm *already* super organized, so I don't need the app at all. This is part of the problem, I guess, because someone who gets to the level where they can appreciate something like this probably doesn't need it, or could otherwise write similar software. But again, the theory is highly fascinating, and I'd love it if more things worked as an intelligent (emphasis on intelligent) database rather than a hierarchial file cabinet.
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
Re: A Perl-app for twingling
by dimar (Curate) on May 20, 2004 at 06:54 UTC
|
The Problem: Why "Twingling" has not caught on
It's not that people aren't interested in it, it's that people's perception has been 'atrophied' by the pervasive 'folders and files' metaphor. Consequently, there are two types of computer users, those who can benefit from this approach, and those who don't yet realize they can benefit from it.
See, for example, limits of folders and
more limits of folders.
and
Pivot tables and
faceted classification.
Just some links off the tippy top of my head ... this 'twingling' thing is not a new phenomenon, but another name for something that hasn't seem to catch on in the mainstream. Perhaps 'twingling' will catch some hype and get people's attention. Perhaps the *multitude* of other versions of the same thing (but by different names) will catch on ... (btw anyone know where the word 'twingling' even comes from???)
| [reply] |
|
|
btw anyone know where the word 'twingling' even comes from???
Look at the "intertwingularity" link in my first post above.
Btw, your observation is correct. Which is why I am surprised, because it is not only a useful concept, it is tres cool to boot.
Thanks for the links on "limts of folders," etc. Good reading.
| [reply] |