in reply to Re: Perl ugrade
in thread Perl ugrade

Sorry...I'm using a Windows 2000 machine. And unicode has no importance to us in the foreseeable future. If we were to use 5.8.4, for example, would we have to modify scripts that were written to run with 5.6? Thanks again

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Perl ugrade
by Zaxo (Archbishop) on May 18, 2004 at 17:53 UTC

    Most people seem more or less happy with the ActiveState binary distributions for win32. Cygwin is another, and it has the advantage of a C compiler, a unix-alike shell, and make. Learning to use cygwin is a significant commitment.

    Most scripts written for 5.6 work fine in 5.8. If you used nothing marked 'deprecated', the worst you will see is warning of newly deprecated misfeatures. The perldelta docs will tell you what has changed.

    After Compline,
    Zaxo