Evil links

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Evil links by diotalevi (Canon) on May 23, 2004 at 14:18 UTC
You could always say this without [href://...] as well. It's just a tadge more verbose but equally functional.	[reply]
Re: Evil links by Mr. Muskrat (Canon) on May 24, 2004 at 01:33 UTC
ambrus, did you inform the gods or pmdev of this issue before posting this? What is the purpose of this post? Are you trying to give evil doers something to wreck havoc with or did you simply not think this through before posting?	[reply]
Re: Re: Evil links by Wassercrats (Initiate) on May 24, 2004 at 02:01 UTC
I suggested to whatever higher-ups were in CB at the time that the instructions for doing this be deleted, but they never were. I agree with you that perhaps this entire thread should be deleted. Unfortunately, I don't have the rank to consider it because apparently the only posts of mine that get upvoted are ones I didn't compose. Remember that ambrus didn't get notice of your reply. I did, even though the top post of this thread, which you replied to, wasn't composed by me.	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re: Evil links by CountZero (Bishop) on May 23, 2004 at 22:57 UTC
Now if only I could be sure that all my negative nodes are the result of such evil links, I could sleep peacefully again! ;) CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.