in reply to poor mans embedding

Perhaps I'm just stupid and can't see this, but I have a few questions:
  1. What are you trying to accomplish?
  2. Whats the difference between your script and the regular perl.exe that links against the libraries anyways?
  3. Why not use miniperl or par?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: poor mans embedding
by Ctrl-z (Friar) on May 26, 2004 at 00:12 UTC
    Whats the difference between your script and the regular perl.exe that links against the libraries anyways?

    Nothing as it stands - except that this doesn't rely on the Perl source and is compilable by the C/make-challenged such as myself ;-)
    Given the amount of general interest in distributing standalone perl-apps and responses to tools such as tinyperl (including yours!)...i thought this might be good news for some people - especially seeing as the code is portable to some extent.

    Why not use miniperl or par?

    Like i tried to say above...packaging apps is fine as it is, im not trying to make another perl2exe or PAR.

    I guess what my meditation was; how far could you conceivably get just manually poking at the library without #including perl.h?


    edit: layout and grammer



    time was, I could move my arms like a bird and...