in reply to Is Geo::PostalCode ready for prime time?

Can't comment on the module itself but the cpan testers page isn't comforting. 17 fails and 0 passes just isn't a good thing.

Update : Guess I should have read the documentation a little more. You need to load the data into the berkeley db before any of the tests pass. The test results could make that a little clearer....
  • Comment on Re: Is Geo::PostalCode ready for prime time?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Is Geo::PostalCode ready for prime time?
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Jun 01, 2004 at 00:54 UTC
    17 fails and 0 passes just isn't a good thing.
    I would just look at the tests of the last distribution, or the one I was trying to install. In general, consistent failure like this indicates a poorly written (or just not cpan-tester friendly) test suite.
    Update : Guess I should have read the documentation a little more. You need to load the data into the berkeley db before any of the tests pass. The test results could make that a little clearer....
    I would disagree with you there. The module should throw a critical error if the required databases don't exist, and the test suite should skip all the tests, although it would be a better idea to just include the data in the distribution.

    MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
    I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
    ** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.