Re^3: reference to a subroutine inside a package

but yes i have to instantiate the class and pass it as an argument (that's not problem, well if you are an OO purist it is)

why would that be a problem for OO purists?
$object->$coderef($arg1, $arg2, ...);
seems to be perfect OO style...

update: one might think (i thought that too for a while) that only
$coderef->($object, $arg1, $arg2, ...);
will work, which, of course, isn't too nice OOP.

Comment on Re^3: reference to a subroutine inside a package Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: reference to a subroutine inside a package by Happy-the-monk (Canon) on Jun 03, 2004 at 11:40 UTC
seems to be perfect OO style... Because you are used to seeing this. Some OO purists dislike arguments (to methods, not the other kind). They would probably prefer it like this: `$object->$coderef( $object->$other_coderef_to_access_arg1_through_argn );` Cheers, Sören	[reply]
Re^5: reference to a subroutine inside a package by tinita (Parson) on Jun 03, 2004 at 11:50 UTC
Some OO purists dislike arguments (to methods, not the other kind). that's new to me. i wonder how it's possible to program without arguments.	[reply]