Re: passing and processing code references

ELABORATION I would like to be able to do this (just like calling Perl's grep function:

x { print "$file.YYY" }
[download]

I dont want to have to bother with creating an anonymous subroutine.

Comment on Re: passing and processing code references Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: Re: passing and processing code references by mirod (Canon) on Oct 11, 2000 at 17:55 UTC
I dont want to have to bother with creating an anonymous subroutine. This kind of comment always puzzles me. Why would you bother exclude a probably conveninet solution to your problem without any specific reason? In this case what's wrong with anonymous subroutines? If there is a good reason please elaborate. That might give us some food for thought. Otherwise I don't really want to bother going through arbitrary hoops just for the sake of it. Just my 0.0229 Euro rant	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

RE: Re: passing and processing code references
by mirod (Canon) on Oct 11, 2000 at 17:55 UTC

I dont want to have to bother with creating an anonymous subroutine.
This kind of comment always puzzles me. Why would you bother exclude a probably conveninet solution to your problem without any specific reason? In this case what's wrong with anonymous subroutines? If there is a good reason please elaborate. That might give us some food for thought. Otherwise I don't really want to bother going through arbitrary hoops just for the sake of it.

Just my 0.0229 Euro rant

[reply]