in reply to Comparison of the parsing features of CSV (and xSV) modules

Great node jZed. Definitely a ++ required.

One additional thing that would be useful, for me at least, is how each handles the third field for the following inputs:

"Just","Another",,"Hacker"
"Just","Another","","Hacker"

My view of the standard is that the first example should give undef and the second should be an empty string.

Regards,
Dom.

  • Comment on Re: Comparison of the parsing features of CSV (and xSV) modules