Re: Extending LValuable Subs with Tied Variables

I saw this question just before I wanted to switch of my computer and go home.

I don't know why, but something says me that indeed tie-ing might be the solution for this matter.

CountZero

"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

Comment on Re: Extending LValuable Subs with Tied Variables Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Extending LValuable Subs with Tied Variables by Limbic~Region (Chancellor) on Jun 24, 2004 at 16:31 UTC
CountZero, Perhaps there is implied meaning in your statement or perhaps you didn't read my code. I am combining a tied variable and lvaluable subs. What do you mean? Cheers - L~R	[reply]
Re^3: Extending LValuable Subs with Tied Variables by CountZero (Bishop) on Jun 25, 2004 at 07:01 UTC
I did read your code, but missed the importance of the lvaluable subs reference somehow. Sorry if that confused you. CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law	[reply]