Re: using can() without an object instance?

Try either Blah->can('foo') or UNIVERSAL::can('Blah', 'foo').

------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose

I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested

Comment on Re: using can() without an object instance? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: using can() without an object instance? by shemp (Deacon) on Jun 29, 2004 at 17:40 UTC
Duh! - i guess my brain is not working today - thanks `Blah->can('foo');` [download] is great!	[reply] [d/l]