in reply to Re^3: Is this a secure way to prevent cookie tampering
in thread Is this a secure way to prevent cookie tampering
TIMTOWTDIYes, there is more than one way. Many of the ways are booby trapped, though. It's best to be somewhat less offhand about proposing new cryptographic protocols.
if you are worried about plaintext attacks, gzip the plain text to turn it to binary first.Binary data is still plaintext to a cryptographer. Gzipping can reduce some redundancies in the plaintext, but it also introduces its own structure.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: Is this a secure way to prevent cookie tampering
by exussum0 (Vicar) on Jun 30, 2004 at 19:00 UTC | |
by iburrell (Chaplain) on Jun 30, 2004 at 19:16 UTC | |
by exussum0 (Vicar) on Jun 30, 2004 at 19:34 UTC | |
by iburrell (Chaplain) on Jul 01, 2004 at 16:33 UTC | |
by exussum0 (Vicar) on Jul 01, 2004 at 16:44 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 30, 2004 at 20:37 UTC | |
by exussum0 (Vicar) on Jul 01, 2004 at 02:04 UTC | |
|