in reply to Re: Create a constructor named the same as your package name!
in thread Create a constructor named the same as your package name!

I'm confused, what's wrong with this?

my $e = Example::Module();

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
•Re^3: Create a constructor named the same as your package name!
by merlyn (Sage) on Jul 01, 2004 at 16:19 UTC
    my $e = Example::Module();
    That would be the same as:
    my $e = "Example::Module";
    So no, it doesn't work. I thought about it for a while... and I can't figure out a way around that corner case that doesn't break other class methods. Oh well... gotta say "new" sometime, I guess.

    -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
    Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.

      There is one way that you can overcome it. It's pretty bad, though. :/

      #!/usr/bin/perl -l package Example::Module; use overload '""' => sub { ref shift }; sub new { bless [ $_[1] || "default" ], shift; } sub Example::Module { return Example::Module::->new(@_); } sub print_it { print $_[0]->[0]; } package main; $a = Example::Module(); $a->print_it; $b = Example::Module("b"); $b->print_it; __END__ default b

      Yeah. Not very pretty, I know. Also, it breaks if no parameters is an illegal option (i.e. your constructor returns undef or dies). This would come into play for calls such as Example::Module->print_it. Of course in that case you may as well just return "Example::Module" as the original code had.

      antirice    
      The first rule of Perl club is - use Perl
      The
      ith rule of Perl club is - follow rule i - 1 for i > 1