Re: Regrettable module names

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Regrettable module names by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 05, 2004 at 14:05 UTC
Totally agree. Should have been I'm::a::DBI :) Examine what is said, not who speaks. "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham "Think for yourself!" - Abigail "Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algoritm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Regrettable module names by edan (Curate) on Jul 05, 2004 at 14:57 UTC
Quite right, since "Ima" means "Mother" in Hebrew (well, okay, Aramaic, but let's not get carried away), and I don't think it's supposed to be the mother of all DBI modules... -- edan	[reply]
Re^3: Regrettable module names by hardburn (Abbot) on Jul 06, 2004 at 14:41 UTC
That'll work great until you use some syntax-highlighting editor that mistakes it for a quoted string :) You++ anyway, for finding an almost-good use of the single-quote package seperator. ---- send money to your kernel via the boot loader.. This and more wisdom available from Markov Hardburn.	[reply]
Re^4: Regrettable module names by etcshadow (Priest) on Jul 12, 2004 at 21:48 UTC
Don't forget about another great use of the apostrophe namespace separator. `------------ :Wq Not an editor command: Wq` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Regrettable module names by diotalevi (Canon) on Jul 12, 2004 at 21:55 UTC
This already happens whenever I use `, #, ", and ' in regexps. What editor are you using that it correctly parses perl? Both the cperl-perl and perl-perl major modes of emacs get this sort of stuff wrong all the time.	[reply]
Re^5: Regrettable module names by hardburn (Abbot) on Jul 13, 2004 at 12:44 UTC
Re^5: Regrettable module names by radiantmatrix (Parson) on Dec 14, 2004 at 19:26 UTC