Re: sub-package question

If this is not the case what are intra-file sub-packages good for?

Dividing programs up into separate namespaces. You don't always need it, but sometimes it comes in handy.

Comment on Re: sub-package question

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: sub-package question by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Jul 06, 2004 at 19:16 UTC
The only other benefit I can think of is syntactic sugar. But, that sugar is better solved using factories. shrugs ------ We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age. Then there are Damian modules.... sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon.* - flyingmoose I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: sub-package question
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Jul 06, 2004 at 19:16 UTC

------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose

I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested

[reply]