Re: IMAP bodystructure parser

Looks good.

Rather than picking a new top-level namespace, use one of the current ones; perhaps either Mail::IMAPBodyStructure or Mail::IMAP::BodyStructure.

Comment on Re: IMAP bodystructure parser

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: IMAP bodystructure parser by kappa (Chaplain) on Jul 06, 2004 at 22:57 UTC
I thought about this problem a lot. There is an IMAP::Admin module by Eric Estabrooks but no Mail::IMAP anything. And Mail::IMAPBodyStructure looks like an overloading a level of hierarchy too much, does it not? The thing that brian_d_foy mentioned in his latest meditation. Thanks for reply, I really need every piece of feedback!	[reply]
Re^3: IMAP bodystructure parser by simonm (Vicar) on Jul 07, 2004 at 14:53 UTC
There is ... no Mail::IMAP anything There are modules named Mail::IMAPClient, Mail::IMAPSearch, and Mail::IMAPTalk; that seems good enough for me... And Mail::IMAPBodyStructure looks like an overloading a level of hierarchy too much, does it not? Sounds to me like that's a vote for Mail::IMAP::BodyStructure...	[reply]