Re^4: • What is this?

Everyone has the right to put whatever they think will be useful in node titles. merlyn is not doing this because he thinks it is useful; he said as much in •PLEASE STOP VANITY TAGGING. Well, it never made sense as a protest, and it makes even less sense now. I don't see anybody but merlyn vanity tagging.

This isn't just the oppinion of a random user, BTW. This is my opinion as a God, and I would very much like for it to be followed, or for merlyn to explain himself.

theorbtwo in a Coat of Many Colors. I may be a god, but I'm not infailable. Smack me up if I'm wrong, just like anybody else.

Comment on Re^4: • What is this?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: • What is this? by VSarkiss (Monsignor) on Jul 08, 2004 at 14:45 UTC
I may be a god, but I'm not infailable. Smack me up if I'm wrong... Smack! The word you want is infallible.	[reply]
Re^6: • What is this? by Solo (Deacon) on Jul 08, 2004 at 17:40 UTC
Frankly, I appreciated the irony. --Solo -- You said you wanted to be around when I made a mistake; well, this could be it, sweetheart.	[reply]
Re^6: • What is this? by allolex (Curate) on Jul 09, 2004 at 14:06 UTC
What need to gods have for spelling? ;) Update: Mentally changed the apico-alveolar unvoiced plosive into a voiced one. (Although it is debatable whether the difference is due to the consonantal voicing or to vowel length...) Thanks for pointing out the mistake, grinder. :) -- Damon Allen Davison http://www.allolex.net	[reply]