in reply to CGI.pm HTML-Generation Methods Considered Useful
Here's the big thing for me - CGI has nifty time-savers for generating HTML. Yet, I have NEVER been left with just generating HTML. I have always had some suit come up to me and say "Could you just export this to Excel for me?" or "Can I get a nice printout of that?" (implying PDF). Or, even worse, "Can you graph that for me?". Which is why I wrote PDF::Template, Excel::Template, and Graph::Template - to go with HTML::Template. Same data structure, but it takes me 5 minutes to convert any webpage into a PDF, XLS, or PNG. I'm not knocking CGI as a quick-hit, but I think to use its HTML generation in anything but a one-off is just begging to be hit by a rewrite-by-four.
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose
I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: CGI.pm HTML-Generation Methods Considered Useful
by diotalevi (Canon) on Jul 11, 2004 at 18:24 UTC | |
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Jul 11, 2004 at 21:56 UTC |