I got curious and did a little experiment: the result for super search for reaped nodes doesn't return reaped nodes if words only appear in its reaped body, but it does return reaped nodes if the words searched for appear in their title, and your search includes searching in titles (the default).

For example, super search for "mod_perl" lists mod_perl 1.0 or 2.0 but not its reaped dupe modperl 1.0 or 2.0, where the word only appears in its body; but searching for "modperl" still lists the reaped node, where that word appears in the title.

That ain't right. IMO reaped nodes no longer actually exist, they're only shadows of old nodes. They only remain in the database for archiving purposes, in order not to falsify history (too much). They serve no other practical purpose, and IMO they should never be listed in a result in a Super Search. They should be suppressed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Super Search lists reaped nodes
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Jul 11, 2004 at 17:33 UTC

    Patch created to change this behaviour. Its not applied as I won't touch Super Search without speaking to tye first. Too much chance to bring the DB to its knees if you don't know exactly whats going on... And I only have a fairly good understanding of it, and not a comprehensive understanding.


    ---
    demerphq

      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
      -- Gandhi