Re^2: threads question

Ah, indeed, silly me. Never thought all the Thread::something modules were actually intended to work with the threads module, due to the difference in name. Looks like a whole lotta sexy code just waiting for me to put it to good use.

Many thanks indeed.

Comment on Re^2: threads question

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: threads question by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 17, 2004 at 16:58 UTC
Yes. The namespaces are confusing. Unfortunately, several of the Thread::* modules intended for use with 5005threads are non-useful with ithreads, but will likely never be removed or upgraded. The good news is that liz generated several new modules that are. Thread::Use is small and rather uninspiringly named, but extremely Use-ful. Examine what is said, not who speaks. "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham "Think for yourself!" - Abigail "Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algoritm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon	[reply]
Re^4: threads question by Forsaken (Friar) on Jul 17, 2004 at 20:21 UTC
it is indeed :-) saves me a good chunk of memory even with just 5 threads running. Tx for the tip.	[reply]
Re^5: threads question by Anonymous Monk on Jul 18, 2004 at 08:15 UTC
perldoc -f use perldoc -f require	[reply]
Re^6: threads question by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 18, 2004 at 10:57 UTC