in reply to Re^2: Sorting based on filesize.
in thread Sorting based on filesize.
I'd say it's doubtful. Clearly, stat is slow, but it's not a slouch, and the Schwartz Transform adds its own overhead. I suspect the sweet spot where the ST pulls ahead is higher than you think.Actually, this is the core of one of the alpaca exercises, and I forget the exact numbers, but the ST turns out to be faster after only 10 or 15 files in our investigation. Stat may not be doggy, but it's still a context switch and a lot of bit wrangling. Much better to do that only once per file.
And (ahem) it's Schwartzian Transform not Schwartz Transform. If you're going to poo-poo it in favor of the more complex GRT, at least spell it right. {grin}
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Sorting based on filesize.
by pbeckingham (Parson) on Jul 21, 2004 at 00:46 UTC |