in reply to negative regex without !~
Again, if your "special" software doesn't allow for !~ then how are we to guess at if something else will succeed or fail within this "special" software without knowing what that software is?
- - arden.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: negative regex without !~
by grinder (Bishop) on Jul 22, 2004 at 16:55 UTC | |
by merlyn (Sage) on Jul 22, 2004 at 21:36 UTC | |
|
Re^2: negative regex without !~
by fletcher_the_dog (Friar) on Jul 22, 2004 at 18:58 UTC | |
by SpanishInquisition (Pilgrim) on Oct 11, 2004 at 16:32 UTC | |
|
Re^2: negative regex without !~
by blueAdept (Beadle) on Jul 22, 2004 at 16:56 UTC | |
by freddo411 (Chaplain) on Jul 22, 2004 at 20:25 UTC | |
by jryan (Vicar) on Jul 23, 2004 at 00:31 UTC | |
by sgifford (Prior) on Jul 22, 2004 at 18:17 UTC |