in reply to problem with using "perlcc" command.

perlcc is experimental, not supported, and not under active development. My impression is that it is not usable for production purposes.

PAR, which packages the Perl modules, libraries, and interpreter into an executable is a better solution. It does not compile the bytecode but does solve the problem of producing a single file that can be distributed.

  • Comment on Re: problem with using "perlcc" command.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: problem with using "perlcc" command.
by munu (Novice) on Jul 30, 2004 at 06:31 UTC
    I have tried with PAR(pp) also.
    for ex.
    pp -o a a.pl
    pp -o a.exe a.pl

    but i can not run the executables ("$ ./a" in linux or "c:/a.exe" in WIN2K)
    error messege "bash :./a can not execute binary file" comes in case of linux.
    and "file is too big to be fitted in memory" error messege comes in windows.

    MUNU