Re^4: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Aug 01, 2004 at 01:44 UTC
That sounds like a really good basis on which to judge something. Oh, a few days ago, Perl segfaulted on me. Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re^5: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware by OhReally (Monk) on Aug 01, 2004 at 15:50 UTC
You dont need cygwin to run xemacs. I even provided a link for you, I shouldnt have wasted my time on what is clearly a troll I suppose :(	[reply]
Re^6: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware by ysth (Canon) on Aug 01, 2004 at 23:57 UTC
No troll. I was in the CB then too; someone suggested xemacs (you?) and someone else said something like "xemacs sucks, don't use it" and nothing more was said about it. Given the number of editors out there, I can see dropping it from my list to try based only on that if I were in Wassercrats position.	[reply]
Re^7: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware by OhReally (Monk) on Aug 02, 2004 at 17:06 UTC
Thanks for the background. It wasnt me who suggested it in the CB so there is at least two of us who recommend it ;-)	[reply]