in reply to expect users to program or define a simple definition language?

By far the best solution is to have a config script driven solution.
If you feel that the re-write necessary to do this is too gargantuan, have you thought about trying to obtain more coding colleagues, and have it as an ongoing open source project?
This way, you open up what sounds like a very useful tool to the largest possible audience, without taking too much of the load on your own shoulders.
As per Merlyn's post above, there are Perl modules around that happily process XML, which could take a lot of work from you too.
I tend to use XML, as most people feel pretty at home with the style of it, and it's very easily extensible.
Anyway, that's just my tuppence worth.

Malk

*I lost my .sig. Do you have a spare?*
  • Comment on Re: expect users to program or define a simple definition language?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: Re: expect users to program or define a simple definition language?
by BastardOperator (Monk) on Oct 23, 2000 at 19:44 UTC
    Well, it is an open source project. Unfortunately, it's currently written in a different language *cough*python*cough*, so I can't imagine getting help from anyone here. To tell you the truth, my whole open source experience has been frustrating. I've received really no help, but many requests for this capability and others. One guy wanted to be able to upload images. I don't know if I'm just bitching right now or not, but frankly this thing has done as much as I really care for it to do. The whole "defining types" problem isn't really a problem to me. I more or less figured that people would download this and if they wanted different features, they would take the time to hack them themselves. I'd like for it to be able to do such neat things, but I'm not trying to fool anyone, I'm not a _real_ programmer, I'm a SysAdmin. :)

    Part of the reason that I'm asking about this here is this, I originally did this in Python for 2 reasons, first to learn it, second because I figured it would be an easier language for people to hack on. Number one is done, I learned it (enough for me at least), and number two is worthless if nobody is hacking it. Perl has _many_ more modules and people using it, so I'm thinking why not rewrite it in perl where I don't have to reinvent the wheel quite so often and I have more chance of getting people involved. I need to rethink my architecture in the process though and that's where I'm at now. I dread the thought of having to take time out to learn XML, I assume DTD's would be the way to go for this, but I don't know enough about it to be sure. 4,500 lines of code down the drain.... oi veh
      You have learned well, grasshopper. {grin}

      Just because some open-source project can be hacked doesn't mean it will be hacked. Perhaps your code didn't get anyone else's job done easier. Perhaps reinventing Everything wasn't the right way to go. Perhaps Python is less fun to program. {grin}

      -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker