in reply to Re: Perl xml parser
in thread Perl xml parser
XML::LibXML also offers much simpler and clearer interface than XML::Parser. I'd never use XML::Parser directly; at the least, you need XML::Twig to get any work done.
Another serious reason in favour of libxml, which is much more practically important than its performance, is that consumes much less memory — a huge win when you're working with larger XML files. (It's no fun when your Perl processes grow to 600MB to generate a mere 40MB XML file.)
On unixoid systems, the dependencies are not likely to be a problem either. I don't know if there's a PPM for Windows people, but if so, that should work with a minimum of fuss for them.
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Perl xml parser
by gaal (Parson) on Aug 02, 2004 at 18:08 UTC |