in reply to "panic: top_env": Is this error resulting from a Perl bug?
But what's with the "panic: top_env" message? And why doesn't it print out a diagnostic too?This panic: message doesn't actually seem to be implemented as a warn or die; it just does the equivalent of print STDERR "panic: top_env\n"; and then bails out of the parser with an error. Perhaps this is also a bug :)
You can still get the diagnostics by piping STDERR to the splain utility:
$ perl -e'qr/(?{rand < 5})/' 2>&1 |splain Warning: Use of "rand" without parentheses is ambiguous at (re_eval 1) + line 1 (# 1) (S ambiguous) You wrote a unary operator followed by something tha +t looks like a binary operator that could also have been interpreted + as a term or unary operator. For instance, if you know that the rand function has a default argument of 1.0, and you write rand + 5; you may THINK you wrote the same thing as rand() + 5; but in actual fact, you got rand(+5); So put in parentheses to say what you really mean. panic: top_env (#2) (P) The compiler attempted to do a goto, or something weird like t +hat.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: "panic: top_env": Is this error resulting from a Perl bug?
by hv (Prior) on Aug 15, 2004 at 19:39 UTC |