in reply to Re^5: B::Generate for Win32?
in thread B::Generate for Win32?

Okay. Just so I know I understand what your saying...

If someone attempting to build B::Generate, was doing it on top of a copy of perl they had built themselves--which most unix people/perl hackers would be--then the "missing bits" would probably be "lying around" in appropriate places and would get picked up and used when building Generate.xs.

But because I was attempting to build on top of a binary distribution of perl, the objects and libs created by the Perl build process aren't there, hence the failure. And no amount of hacking, beyond rebuild perl myself and building B::Generate on top of that, is going to let me succeed.

Did I get it?


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail
"Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: B::Generate for Win32?
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Aug 22, 2004 at 02:02 UTC
    Yup, you got it. Followup here (in this thread) if you get anything out of the p5p.

    MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
    I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
    ** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.